[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56CD8FD2.6080600@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 16:41:14 +0530
From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To: <wsa@...-dreams.de>
CC: <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: core: add devm apis for i2c_new_dummy and i2c_unregister
Hi Wolfram,
On Monday 08 February 2016 06:57 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> Add device managed APIs for i2c_new_dummy() and
> i2c_unregister_device() so that it can be managed by
> device framework for freeing it.
>
> This helps on following:
> 1. Maintaining the resource allocation and deallocation
> i2c_dummy = i2c_new_dummy();
> devm_regmap_init_i2c(i2c_dummy, ®map_config)
>
> On this case, the user of i2c_dummy which is
> devm_regmap_init_i2c() is managed allocation where
> i2c_new_dummy() is not.
> On Free path, we have
> i2c_unregister_device(i2c_dummy)
> and later, device framework release the regmap. In this
> case, client of i2c_dummy after the i2c_dummy.
>
> By using devm apis, the sequence can be maintain
> i2c_dummy = devm_i2c_new_dummy();
> devm_regmap_init_i2c(i2c_dummy, ®map_config)
>
> and resource deallocation will be done in reverse order
> by device framework.
>
> 2. No need to release the i2c_client in error/remove path and hence
> there is less code requirement.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
>
Can you please review this?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists