[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56CF8043.1030603@emindsoft.com.cn>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 06:29:23 +0800
From: Chen Gang <chengang@...ndsoft.com.cn>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
CC: trivial@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, vbabka@...e.cz,
rientjes@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mhocko@...e.cz,
hannes@...xchg.org, vdavydov@...tuozzo.com,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH trivial] include/linux/gfp.h: Improve the coding styles
On 2/26/16 00:07, Mel Gorman wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 06:26:31AM +0800, chengang@...ndsoft.com.cn wrote:
>
> I do not want this patch to go through the trivial tree. It still adds
> another step to identifying relevant commits through git blame and has
> limited, if any, benefit to maintainability.
>
>> "it's preferable to preserve blame than go through a layer of cleanup
>> when looking for the commit that defined particular flags".
>>
>
> git blame identifies what commit last altered a line. If a cleanup patch
> is encountered then the tree before that commit needs to be examined
> which adds time. It's rare that cleanup patches on their own are useful
> and this is one of those cases.
>
git is a tool mainly for analyzing code, but not mainly for normal
reading main code.
So for me, the coding styles need not consider about git.
Thanks.
--
Chen Gang (陈刚)
Managing Natural Environments is the Duty of Human Beings.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists