[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1905248.5bkSJ3vszA@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:03:58 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Drop pointless label from acpi_cpufreq_target()
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
The "out" label at the final return statement in acpi_cpufreq_target()
is totally pointless, so drop them and modify the code to return the
right values immediately instead of jumping to it.
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_target(struct cp
} else {
pr_debug("Already at target state (P%d)\n",
next_perf_state);
- goto out;
+ return 0;
}
}
@@ -456,8 +456,7 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_target(struct cp
cmd.val = (u32) perf->states[next_perf_state].control;
break;
default:
- result = -ENODEV;
- goto out;
+ return -ENODEV;
}
/* cpufreq holds the hotplug lock, so we are safe from here on */
@@ -480,7 +479,6 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_target(struct cp
if (!result)
perf->state = next_perf_state;
-out:
return result;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists