[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56CF9069.4060505@opensource.altera.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 17:38:17 -0600
From: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com>
To: Tim Sander <tim@...eglstein.org>
CC: Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@...gutronix.de>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"Russell King" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dts: add specific compatible type for Terasic DE0-NANO-SoC
Board
On 02/25/2016 05:34 PM, Tim Sander wrote:
> As far as i remember there are different de0 and different sockit boards, so
> the name does not seem to be as concise? I don't care but i would say that
> de0-nano-soc is the most concise and easier to search for than atlas which
> might turn up more false postives?
>
I'm fine with "terasic,de0-nano-soc".
Dinh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists