linux-kernel - [PATCH v10 05/59] sparc/PCI: Keep resource idx order with bridge register number

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1456366370-28995-6-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>
Date:	Wed, 24 Feb 2016 18:11:56 -0800
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Wei Yang <weiyang@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, TJ <linux@....tj>,
	Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>,
	Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>
Cc:	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v10 05/59] sparc/PCI: Keep resource idx order with bridge register number

On one system found strange "no compatible bridge window" warning

PCI: Claiming 0000:00:01.0: Resource 14: 0002000100000000..000200010fffffff [10220c]
PCI: Claiming 0000:01:00.0: Resource 1: 0002000100000000..000200010000ffff [100214]
pci 0000:01:00.0: can't claim BAR 1 [mem 0x2000100000000-0x200010000ffff 64bit]: no compatible bridge window

and we already had pref_compat support that add extra pref bit for device
resource.

It turns out that pci_resource_compatible()/pci_up_path_over_pref_mem64()
just check resource with bridge pref mmio register idx 15, and we have put
resource to use mmio register idx 14 during of_scan_pci_bridge()
as the bridge does not mmio resource.

We already fix pci_up_path_over_pref_mem64() to check all bus resources.

And at the same time, this patch will make resource to have consistent sequence
like other arch or directly from pci_read_bridge_bases(),
even when non-pref mmio is missing, or out of ordering in firmware reporting.

Just hold i = 1 for non pref mmio, and i = 2 for pref mmio.

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Tested-by: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>
---
 arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c
index 0e82584..36a0dfb 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c
@@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ static void of_scan_pci_bridge(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm,
 		pci_read_bridge_bases(bus);
 		goto after_ranges;
 	}
-	i = 1;
+	i = 3;
 	for (; len >= 32; len -= 32, ranges += 8) {
 		u64 start;
 
@@ -504,6 +504,12 @@ static void of_scan_pci_bridge(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm,
 				       " for bridge %s\n", node->full_name);
 				continue;
 			}
+		} else if ((flags & IORESOURCE_PREFETCH) &&
+			   !bus->resource[2]->flags) {
+			res = bus->resource[2];
+		} else if (((flags & (IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_PREFETCH)) ==
+			    IORESOURCE_MEM) && !bus->resource[1]->flags) {
+			res = bus->resource[1];
 		} else {
 			if (i >= PCI_NUM_RESOURCES - PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCES) {
 				printk(KERN_ERR "PCI: too many memory ranges"
-- 
1.8.4.5