[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1456369267-904461-67-git-send-email-green@linuxhacker.ru>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 22:00:49 -0500
From: green@...uxhacker.ru
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>,
Oleg Drokin <green@...uxhacker.ru>
Subject: [PATCH v2 66/84] staging/lustre: Remove misleading liblustre comments.
From: Oleg Drokin <green@...uxhacker.ru>
These two comments certainly refer to some ifdefed code that is
no longer present, so remove them too.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <green@...uxhacker.ru>
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pool.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pool.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pool.c
index 210304f..8608b09 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pool.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pool.c
@@ -152,7 +152,6 @@ struct cfs_hash_ops pool_hash_operations = {
};
-/* ifdef needed for liblustre support */
/*
* pool debugfs seq_file methods
*/
@@ -432,7 +431,6 @@ int lov_pool_new(struct obd_device *obd, char *poolname)
INIT_HLIST_NODE(&new_pool->pool_hash);
- /* we need this assert seq_file is not implemented for liblustre */
/* get ref for debugfs file */
lov_pool_getref(new_pool);
new_pool->pool_debugfs_entry = ldebugfs_add_simple(
--
2.1.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists