linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL 3/7] drivers: soc: EXYNOS drivers for v4.6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <56CE880C.8090703@samsung.com>
Date:	Thu, 25 Feb 2016 13:50:20 +0900
From:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To:	"pankaj.dubey" <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
	arm@...nel.org, Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@...sung.com>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 3/7] drivers: soc: EXYNOS drivers for v4.6

On 25.02.2016 13:19, pankaj.dubey wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
>>>
>>> OMAP has GPMC drivers under drivers/memory. I wonder if SROM should go there
>>> too, since it's a quite similar bus.
>>
>> I wish I get this feedback before, when we were discussing the SROM
>> patches. :/
>>
>> Indeed this sounds reasonable. On some boards the omap-gpmc is used for
>> the same purpose: interfacing to smsc,lan9115 (like on SMDK5410).
>>
>>
>>> Feel free to respin this without SROM now, so we can get the other pieces in
>>> sooner and then revisit the SROM asyncronously. That'll remove the dependencies
>>> on DT as well.
>>
>> Okay, I'll rebase all drivers/soc branches and respin the pull request
>> so PMU driver and other stuff could go in.
>>
>> BTW, just in case, although PMU stands for "Power Management Unit" I
>> don't think it should be placed under drivers/power because it is not a
>> avs/charger/battery/reset driver. Existing power-related drivers are
>> under driver/soc (bcm, dove, tegra).
>>
>> Re-work of SROM drivers could be started on top of it.
>>
> 
> Please let me know if I need to take care of any of this work.

Yes, unfortunately I need your help with that.

I rebased mach-exynos/drivers-soc related patches and pushed it to my
next/soc branch:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git/log/?h=next/soc

There are some changes in commits, mostly for movement of PMU driver
(now it is applied first, before SROMc driver). I also applied some of
the cleanup and maintainer patches from SROMc patchset. DT changes are
already merged.

Overall, could you rebase remaining patches on top of my next/soc and
move SROM driver to drivers/memory? You can also rebase Pavel Fedin's
patches (if you don't I will rebase them).


Last version of applied SROMc patches is here:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git/log/?h=for-v4.6/drivers-soc-exynos-srom-pmu

Best regards,
Krzysztof