lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:34:33 +0800 From: Miles Chen <miles.chen@...iatek.com> To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com> CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, <wsdupstream@...iatek.com>, <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64/mm: fix virtual address boundary check On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 16:19 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:01:48AM +0800, miles.chen@...iatek.com wrote: > > From: Miles Chen <miles.chen@...iatek.com> > > > > The MODULES_VADDR is not the lowest possible > > kernel virtual address. TASK_SIZE_64 may be larger than > > MODULES_VADDR, FIXADDR_TOP, and PCI_IO_START. > > > > Fix this by comparing TASK_SIZE_64 (highest user virtual address) > > with VA_START (lowest kernel virtual address). > > > > #define VA_BITS (CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS) > > #define VA_START (UL(0xffffffffffffffff) << VA_BITS) > > #define PAGE_OFFSET (UL(0xffffffffffffffff) << (VA_BITS - 1)) > > #define MODULES_END (PAGE_OFFSET) > > #define MODULES_VADDR (MODULES_END - SZ_64M) > > #define PCI_IO_END (MODULES_VADDR - SZ_2M) > > #define PCI_IO_START (PCI_IO_END - PCI_IO_SIZE) > > #define FIXADDR_TOP (PCI_IO_START - SZ_2M) > > #define TASK_SIZE_64 (UL(1) << VA_BITS) > > We should remove these checks altogether. There is a huge gap between > the user and kernel addresses that they would never overlap (we don't > have enough levels of page tables to cover 64-bit VA space). > Thanks for your reply. I confirmed that in the ARMv8 documentation. I'll send another patch to remove these checks. Cheers, Miles
Powered by blists - more mailing lists