[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160225084056.GC12294@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:40:57 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
"linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/entry/32: Add an ASM_CLAC to
entry_SYSENTER_32
* Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 09:14 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > But but ... 'context tracking' is not really something that a regular distro
> > kernel cares about much - it's a nohz-full special AFAICS.
Let me qualify that: with the timer code maintenance hat on I really love all nohz
variants (the deeper the better), but now I have my x86 maintainer hat on, and as
such I'm really annoyed at those nohz folks adding overhead to the syscall hot
path! ;-)
> (psst.. distros are shipping it)
Yeah, indeed, Fedora does - but AFAICS:
fomalhaut:~> grep NO_HZ /boot/config-4.1.13-100.fc21.x86_64
CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON=y
# CONFIG_NO_HZ_IDLE is not set
CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y
# CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_ALL is not set
# CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE is not set
CONFIG_NO_HZ=y
CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ=y
... which won't result in actual full-nohz CPUs unless you boot it with a special
boot parameter, right?
What is the easiest way to query which/how many CPUs are in nohz-full mode and do
context tracking? I somehow thought /proc/timer_* had that info, but that does not
appear to be the case.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists