linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] Remove dl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160225094655.GA3680@pablo>
Date:	Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:46:55 +0000
From:	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
To:	luca abeni <luca.abeni@...tn.it>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
	vincent.guittot@...aro.org, wanpeng.li@...mail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] Remove dl_new

Hi,

On 24/02/16 14:53, luca abeni wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 16:42:49 +0100
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:57:04AM +0100, Luca Abeni wrote:
> > > switched_to_dl() can be used instead
> > 
> > This seems unrelated to the other patches, and looks like a nice
> > cleanup.
> 
> Ok; I'll rebase the patch on master and I'll run some more serious
> tests (Juri, your tests repository is available on github, right? Can I
> assume that if the patch passes your tests then it is ok?).
> If everything goes well, I'll submit the patch.
> 

Yes, tests reside here https://github.com/jlelli/tests. They should give
you some confidence that things are not completely broken, but of course
they might be still broken and you do not notice by running such tests.
:-)

Please run also the PI related onces, they might be important in this
case.

Anyway, I'd say that, once you are fine with it, you can submit the
patch an then we have a second look at it.

Thanks,

- Juri