[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1456396790.15739.11.camel@ellerman.id.au>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 21:39:50 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Cc: duwe@....de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, pmladek@...e.com, jeyu@...hat.com,
jkosina@...e.cz, live-patching@...r.kernel.org, mbenes@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/12] powerpc/ftrace: ftrace_graph_caller() needs to
save/restore toc
On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 11:30 +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
>
> On 25/02/16 01:28, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
> > index 2a7313cfbc7d..9e77a2c8f218 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
> > @@ -1237,6 +1237,11 @@ _GLOBAL(ftrace_graph_caller)
> > std r5, 64(r1)
> > std r4, 56(r1)
> > std r3, 48(r1)
> > +
> > + /* Save callee's TOC in the ABI compliant location */
> > + std r2, 24(r1)
> R2_STACK_OFFSET for readability?
Hmm, maybe. Personally when I see "24(r1)" what my brain reads is "stack TOC
save slot", but maybe I've been spending too much time with powerpc assembly.
R2_STACK_OFFSET is actually new, pulled out from the module code by Torsten.
Other code uses STK_GOT to mean the same thing. I don't really like either
name, so I'll probably leave do a clean up once this is in.
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists