[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1456400154.4666.30.camel@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 11:35:54 +0000
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Thomas Betker <thomas.betker@...enet.de>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Betker <thomas.betker@...de-schwarz.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jffs2: Don't add summary entry when MTD write fails
On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 21:27 +0100, Thomas Betker wrote:
>
> int jffs2_flash_direct_writev(struct jffs2_sb_info *c, const struct kvec *vecs,
> unsigned long count, loff_t to, size_t *retlen)
> {
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = mtd_writev(c->mtd, vecs, count, to, retlen);
> +
> if (!jffs2_is_writebuffered(c)) {
> if (jffs2_sum_active()) {
> int res;
> +
> + if (ret ||
> + *retlen != iov_length((struct iovec *) vecs, count))
> + return ret;
> +
> res = jffs2_sum_add_kvec(c, vecs, count, (uint32_t) to);
> if (res) {
> return res;
OK... but perhaps we can dispense with the separate 'ret' and 'res'
variables and the rats nest of conditions, and do something like:
int ret;
ret = mtd_writev(…);
if (!ret && *retlen == iov_length(…) &&
!jffs2_is_writebuffered(c) && jffs2_sum_active())
ret = jffs2_sum_add_kvec(…);
return ret;
--
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@...el.com Intel Corporation
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (5691 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists