[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160225140204.GG21932@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 15:02:04 +0100
From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@....de>
To: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, pmladek@...e.com, jeyu@...hat.com,
jkosina@...e.cz, live-patching@...r.kernel.org, mbenes@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/12] powerpc/ftrace: ftrace_graph_caller() needs to
save/restore toc
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:30:38AM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
> On 25/02/16 01:28, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
> > ---
> > arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S | 8 ++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >
Ah, -mprofile-kernel, DYNAMIC_FTRACE but without REGS.
Hadn't considered that, thanks!
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
> > index 2a7313cfbc7d..9e77a2c8f218 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
> > @@ -1237,6 +1237,11 @@ _GLOBAL(ftrace_graph_caller)
> > std r5, 64(r1)
> > std r4, 56(r1)
> > std r3, 48(r1)
> > +
> > + /* Save callee's TOC in the ABI compliant location */
> > + std r2, 24(r1)
> R2_STACK_OFFSET for readability?
I have encountered LRSAVE vs. PPC_LR_STKOFF and
STK_GOT vs. R2_STACK_OFFSET, some usable in assembler source, some in C.
> > + ld r2, PACATOC(r13) /* get kernel TOC in r2 */
> > +
> > mfctr r4 /* ftrace_caller has moved local addr here */
> > std r4, 40(r1)
> > mflr r3 /* ftrace_caller has restored LR from stack */
> > @@ -1262,6 +1267,9 @@ _GLOBAL(ftrace_graph_caller)
> > ld r4, 56(r1)
> > ld r3, 48(r1)
> >
> > + /* Restore callee's TOC */
> > + ld r2, 24(r1)
> > +
> > addi r1, r1, 112
> > mflr r0
> > std r0, LRSAVE(r1)
>
> Reviewed-by: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Torsten Duwe <duwe@...e.de>
Torsten
Powered by blists - more mailing lists