[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160225145014.GA2265@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 14:50:15 +0000
From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: "Veal, Bryan E." <bryan.e.veal@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 0/5] Driver for new "VMD" device
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 08:42:19AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 06:24:00PM +0000, Keith Busch wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 04:10:24PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > + /*
> > > + * If the window is below 4GB, clear IORESOURCE_MEM_64 so we can
> > > + * put 32-bit resources in the window.
> > > + *
> > > + * There's no hardware reason why a 64-bit window *couldn't*
> > > + * contain a 32-bit resource, but pbus_size_mem() computes the
> > > + * bridge window size assuming a 64-bit window will contain no
> > > + * 32-bit resources. __pci_assign_resource() enforces that
> > > + * artificial restriction to make sure everything will fit.
> > > + */
> >
> > This sounds good to me. Thanks!
> >
> > > res = &vmd->dev->resource[VMD_MEMBAR1];
> > > upper_bits = upper_32_bits(res->end);
> > > flags = res->flags & ~IORESOURCE_SIZEALIGN;
>
> Can you prepare a patch, that adds both comments, please? (The one
> about how we assume BIOS assigns the BAR below 4GB, and the one I
> drafted above.)
Yep, will send it out be end of today.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists