lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 25 Feb 2016 17:15:11 +0100
From:	Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
To:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
CC:	<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <pawel.moll@....com>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
	<ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>, <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	<linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <gnurou@...il.com>,
	<lee.jones@...aro.org>, <broonie@...nel.org>,
	<a.zummo@...ertech.it>, <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
	<lgirdwood@...il.com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	<rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>, <swarren@...dia.com>,
	<k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 0/8] Add support for MAXIM MAX77620/MAX20024 PMIC

On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 10:10:56AM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> 
> On Tuesday 16 February 2016 09:30 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 05:26:26PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> >>Add SW support for MAXIM Semiconductor's Power Management
> >>IC (PMIC) MAX77620/MAX20024. This PMIC supports DC-DC/LDOS, GPIOs,
> >>RTC, watchdog, clocks etc.
> >Hi Laxman,
> >
> >This series is starting to look pretty good. Do you have patches in the
> >works to add the corresponding DT content for the various boards that we
> >support? I think the Jetson TX1 patch would be most interesting since
> >that's what people can get their hands on.
> >
> 
> Yes, I am just waiting for this series to be concluded and applied. Once it
> is done, I will immediately post the patches to enable this driver in config
> and dt entry for the Jetson-TX1.

Why hold back on the patches? I'm currently having trouble testing
your stash here on Jetson TX1 and I suspect that I'm using the wrong
device tree content (it was derived from downstream many moons ago).
There's nothing wrong with posting patches that depend on patches on
the list. Typically you'd note the dependency in the cover letter to
make it easier for people to find what belongs together.

Thierry

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ