linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2] lkdtm: Add READ_AFTER

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGXu5jLWqyhspaeoMs+UBu34340OfmKB8EpWRab5=c1uHwKRqw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:35:52 -0800
From:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:	Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
Cc:	Laura Abbott <labbott@...oraproject.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" 
	<kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] lkdtm: Add READ_AFTER_FREE test

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 02/24/2016 03:37 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yep, looks like the v1 patches and not the v2 patches which fix
>>>> a known issue with the zeroing.
>>>
>>>
>>> Ah-ha, I'll go find those and retest.
>>
>>
>> I sent out a series that was rebased. It works for me, but I want to
>> make sure I didn't make any glaring issues. I've also sent some fixes
>> to the lkdtm tests. One thing that stands out to me still is that the
>> READ_AFTER_FREE never shows poisoning. I remain confused, since
>> obviously if zeroing is working, it's being correctly poisoned...
>>
>> -Kees
>>
>
> I'll review the rebased series you sent out for the page poisoning patches.
> If it's okay with you, I'll pull in the updates to the LKDTM test.

Yes, please feel free!

> If you
> test with slub_debug=P on the command line do you see the READ_AFTER_FREE
> test working as expected? Setting that on the command line will set up
> the poisoning which should make the READ_AFTER_FREE test fail.

Ah-ha, yes, that was one of the missing pieces:

[   10.790970] lkdtm: Performing direct entry READ_AFTER_FREE
[   10.790992] lkdtm: Value in memory before free: 12345678
[   10.790996] lkdtm: Attempting bad read from freed memory
[   10.790998] lkdtm: Memory correctly poisoned, calling BUG
[   10.791067] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[   10.792037] kernel BUG at drivers/misc/lkdtm.c:465!

I see that "F" is also needed to do the sanity checks, but the poison
ends up being different again from what I was expected:

[    8.643902] lkdtm: Performing direct entry WRITE_AFTER_FREE
[    8.645215] lkdtm: Allocated memory ffff88007b446850-ffff88007b446c50
[    8.646700] lkdtm: Attempting bad write to freed memory at ffff88007b446a50
[    8.648295] =============================================================================
[    8.649275] BUG kmalloc-1024 (Tainted: G      D        ): Poison overwritten
[    8.649275] -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
[    8.649275]
[    8.649275] INFO: 0xffff88007b446a50-0xffff88007b446a53. First byte
0xf0 instead of 0x6b

0x6b is POISON_FREE:

#define POISON_INUSE    0x5a    /* for use-uninitialised poisoning */
#define POISON_FREE     0x6b    /* for use-after-free poisoning */
#define POISON_END      0xa5    /* end-byte of poisoning */

So it seems like there are separate poisonings going on? Modifying
READ_AFTER_FREE a bit more, I see that it looks like only the buddy
allocator is getting the zero poisoning?

[   61.755450] lkdtm: Performing direct entry READ_AFTER_FREE
[   61.757436] lkdtm: Value in memory before free: 12345678
[   61.759390] lkdtm: Attempting bad read from freed memory
[   61.761649] lkdtm: Memory correctly poisoned (6b6b6b6b)

[   62.139408] lkdtm: Performing direct entry READ_BUDDY_AFTER_FREE
[   62.140766] lkdtm: Value in memory before free: 12345678
[   62.141989] lkdtm: Attempting to read from freed memory
[   62.143225] lkdtm: Memory correctly poisoned (0)

Once this series is in, we need to find a way to make a single CONFIG
to be more friendly than needing to add "page_poison=on slub_debug=FP"
to the command line. :)

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS & Brillo Security