linux-kernel - Re: Warning from AMD IOMMU performance counters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56CF3E22.7080402@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:47:14 -0800
From:	Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
To:	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:	Wan Zongshun <vw@...mu.org>, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com,
	iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Warning from AMD IOMMU performance counters

On 02/25/2016 06:57 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 06:51:13PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 09:26:18AM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote:
>>> It was an issue with build signing on the testers machine. Once that was
>>> fixed it was confirmed that the patches did fix the issue.
>>
>> Btw, Joerg did come up with a minimal fix today:
>>
>> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160223121215.GA31151@8bytes.org
>>
>> in case you want to run it instead of that big patchset which is still
>> being reviewed...
>
> I just queued that small fix and tagged it for stable. Suravees patches
> are too intrusive for that and better suited for v4.6.
>
>
> 	Joerg
>

Thanks, I did end up pulling in that small fix.