lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56CF57E5.7040808@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 25 Feb 2016 11:37:09 -0800
From:	Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
To:	Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@...il.com>
Cc:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Linux-IDE <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] 8a3e33cf92c7 "ata: ahci: find eSATA ports and flag
 them as removable" changes userspace behavior

On 02/25/2016 10:56 AM, Manuel Lauss wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We received a bugzilla report
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310682
>> of partitions being automounted unexpectedly. Testing showed that
>> 8a3e33cf92c7 ("ata: ahci: find eSATA ports and flag them as removable") was
>> responsible.
>> This seems to be classified as 'breaking' userspace given that this behavior
>> results
>> in partitions that were previously unmounted now being being mounted
>> unwanted
>> automatically which is unwanted behavior for the user. Can we revert this
>> patch or
>> give a fix to change this behavior?
>
> Do the affected users have sata ports set to hotplug capable? Because that's
> what the patch does: it flags ports which have the hotplug capability enabled
> as "removable", and I guess redhat just automounts anything that is flagged
> as a removable disk (like an usb drive).
>
> Manuel
>

The mounting comes from udisks. udisks will automount anything marked as removable
unless explicitly forbidden. You can argue whether or not this is good design but
it's still a change in behavior from what udisks was relying on to decide
whether or not to automount. lspci from the users hardware:

00:1f.2 SATA controller: Intel Corporation C600/X79 series chipset 6-Port SATA
AHCI Controller (rev 06)

I'll make a build with the patch you gave for testing.

Thanks,
Laura

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ