[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160225202650.GB5763@treble.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 14:26:50 -0600
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Pedro Alves <palves@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...rovitsch.priv.at>,
Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@...onical.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 4/9] x86/objtool: Add STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD macro
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 08:51:49AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/objtool.h b/include/linux/objtool.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..cce9d67
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/linux/objtool.h
>
> So I think this should really be in asm/frame.h, not in an objtool specific
> header.
I agree that it shouldn't be in an objtool-specific header, but
asm/frame.h wouldn't work unless we added that file to all the arches.
And the macro's functionality is arch-independent anyway. So I'm
renaming the file to include/linux/frame.h.
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists