[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56CF6573.1040604@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:34:59 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@...el.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] x86/xsaves: Re-enable XSAVES
On 02/25/2016 12:26 PM, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
> - * ( This is easy to backport while we are fixing
> - * XSAVES* support. )
> + * Most recent CPUs supporting XSAVES can run 64-bit mode.
> + * Enable XSAVES for 64-bit.
> */
> - setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_XSAVES);
> + if (!config_enabled(CONFIG_X86_64))
> + setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_XSAVES);
> }
Is this intended to be permanent? If so, we would not be able to
support any future supervisor features on 32-bit.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists