[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160225210303.GA8924@test-lenovo>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 13:03:03 -0800
From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@...el.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] x86/xsaves: Re-enable XSAVES
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:34:59PM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 02/25/2016 12:26 PM, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
> > - * ( This is easy to backport while we are fixing
> > - * XSAVES* support. )
> > + * Most recent CPUs supporting XSAVES can run 64-bit mode.
> > + * Enable XSAVES for 64-bit.
> > */
> > - setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_XSAVES);
> > + if (!config_enabled(CONFIG_X86_64))
> > + setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_XSAVES);
> > }
>
> Is this intended to be permanent? If so, we would not be able to
> support any future supervisor features on 32-bit.
I was thinking of the 64-bit-only change, but then decided to put it out
for discussion.
Yu-cheng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists