[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56D0A364.5060203@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 16:11:32 -0300
From: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kernel: sched: fix preempt_disable_ip recodring for
preempt_disable()
On 02/26/2016 10:54 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> - trace_preempt_off(CALLER_ADDR0, get_parent_ip(CALLER_ADDR1));
> + trace_preempt_off(CALLER_ADDR0, get_lock_parent_ip());
If !lock_functions(CALLER_ADDR0), the start/stop_critical_timing() will
be called with parent_ip == ip.
Hence, the following trace on start_critical_timing():
__trace_function(tr, ip, parent_ip, flags, preempt_count());
Will show the function calling itself.
Is it a problem? am I missing something?
-- Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists