lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56D0A364.5060203@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 26 Feb 2016 16:11:32 -0300
From:	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
To:	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kernel: sched: fix preempt_disable_ip recodring for
 preempt_disable()



On 02/26/2016 10:54 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> -		trace_preempt_off(CALLER_ADDR0, get_parent_ip(CALLER_ADDR1));
> +		trace_preempt_off(CALLER_ADDR0, get_lock_parent_ip());

If !lock_functions(CALLER_ADDR0), the start/stop_critical_timing() will
be called with parent_ip == ip.

Hence, the following trace on start_critical_timing():

        __trace_function(tr, ip, parent_ip, flags, preempt_count());

Will show the function calling itself.

Is it a problem? am I missing something?

-- Daniel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ