[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52677.1456524057@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 17:00:57 -0500
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Stanislav Brabec <sbrabec@...e.cz>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
"Austin S. Hemmelgarn" <ahferroin7@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: loop subsystem corrupted after mounting multiple btrfs sub-volumes
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 22:00:44 +0100, Stanislav Brabec said:
> Well, it seems to be safe, even if the loop device was not allocated by
> mount(8) itself, as
> ioctl(fd, LOOP_CLR_FD)
> never returns EBUSY:
The fact you don't get an EBUSY doesn't mean it's actually safe....
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists