linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] perf report: Fix dynamic entry display in hierarchy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160226222404.GA8720@kernel.org>
Date:	Fri, 26 Feb 2016 19:24:04 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] perf report: Fix dynamic entry display in hierarchy

Em Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 07:08:19PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > 
> > print fmt: "call_site=%lx ptr=%p bytes_req=%zu bytes_alloc=%zu gfp_flags=%s", REC->call_site, REC->ptr, REC->bytes_req, REC->bytes_alloc, (REC->gfp_flags) ? __print_flags(REC->gfp_flags, "|", {(unsigned long)((((((( gfp_t)(0x400000u|0x2000000u)) | (( gfp_t)0x40u) | (( gfp_t)0x80u) | (( gfp_t)0x20000u)) | (( gfp_t)0x02u)) | (( gfp_t)0x08u)) | (( gfp_t)0x4000u) | (( gfp_t)0x10000u) | (( gfp_t)0x1000u) | (( gfp_t)0x200u)) & ~(( gfp_t)0x2000000u)), "GFP_TRANSHUGE"}, {(unsigned long)((((( gfp_t)(0x400000u|0x2000000u)) | (( gfp_t)0x40u) | (( gfp_t)0x80u) | (( gfp_t)0x20000u)) | (( gfp_t)0x02u)) | (( gfp_t)0x08u)), "GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE"}, {(unsigned long)(((( gfp_t)(0x400000u|0x2000000u)) | (( gfp_t)0x40u) | (( gfp_t)0x80u) | (( gfp_t)0x20000u)) | (( gfp_t)0x02u)), "GFP_HIGHUSER"}, {(unsigned long)((( gfp_t)(0x400000u|0x2000000u)) | (( gfp_t)0x40u) | (( gfp_t)0x80u) | (( gfp_t)0x20000u)), "GFP_USER"}, {(unsigned long)((( gfp_t)(0x400000u|0x2000000u)) | (( gfp_t)0x40u) | (( gfp_t)0x80u) | (( gfp_t)0x10u)), "GFP_TEMPORARY"}, {(unsigned long)((( gfp_t)(0x400000u|0x2000000u)) | (( gfp_t)0x40u) | (( gfp_t)0x80u)), "GFP_KERNEL"}, {(unsigned long)((( gfp_t)(0x400000u|0x2000000u)) | (( gfp_t)0x40u)), "GFP_NOFS"}, {(unsigned long)((( gfp_t)0x20u)|(( gfp_t)0x80000u)|(( gfp_t)0x2000000u)), "GFP_ATOMIC"}, {(unsigned long)((( gfp_t)(0x400000u|0x2000000u))), "GFP_NOIO"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x20u), "GFP_HIGH"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x80000u), "GFP_ATOMIC"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x40u), "GFP_IO"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x100u), "GFP_COLD"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x200u), "GFP_NOWARN"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x400u), "GFP_REPEAT"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x800u), "GFP_NOFAIL"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x1000u), "GFP_NORETRY"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x4000u), "GFP_COMP"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x8000u), "GFP_ZERO"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x10000u), "GFP_NOMEMALLOC"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x2000u), "GFP_MEMALLOC"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x20000u), "GFP_HARDWALL"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x40000u), "GFP_THISNODE"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x10u), "GFP_RECLAIMABLE"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x08u), "GFP_MOVABLE"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x200000u), "GFP_NOTRACK"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x400000u), "GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x2000000u), "GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x800000u), "GFP_OTHER_NODE"} ) : "GFP_NOWAIT"
> > [root@...et ~]# uname -a
> > Linux jouet 4.5.0-rc4 #1 SMP Mon Feb 22 15:53:36 BRT 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> > [root@...et ~]#
> 
> It is exploding at this depth, not liking how gfp_flags is described, problem
> seems to be in this function, this __print_flags() long thing.
> 
> Steven, does this look familiar?

Steven, the same tool works when running on an earlier kernel, i.e.
libtraceevent manages to parse that gfp_flags function, while on 4.5-rc it doesn't, ideas?




[root@...icio ~]# cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kmem/kmalloc/format
name: kmalloc
ID: 411
format:
	field:unsigned short common_type;	offset:0;	size:2;	signed:0;
	field:unsigned char common_flags;	offset:2;	size:1;	signed:0;
	field:unsigned char common_preempt_count;	offset:3;	size:1;	signed:0;
	field:int common_pid;	offset:4;	size:4;	signed:1;

	field:unsigned long call_site;	offset:8;	size:8;	signed:0;
	field:const void * ptr;	offset:16;	size:8;	signed:0;
	field:size_t bytes_req;	offset:24;	size:8;	signed:0;
	field:size_t bytes_alloc;	offset:32;	size:8;	signed:0;
	field:gfp_t gfp_flags;	offset:40;	size:4;	signed:0;

print fmt: "call_site=%lx ptr=%p bytes_req=%zu bytes_alloc=%zu gfp_flags=%s", REC->call_site, REC->ptr, REC->bytes_req, REC->bytes_alloc, (REC->gfp_flags) ? __print_flags(REC->gfp_flags, "|", {(unsigned long)(((( gfp_t)0x10u) | (( gfp_t)0x40u) | (( gfp_t)0x80u) | (( gfp_t)0x20000u) | (( gfp_t)0x02u) | (( gfp_t)0x08u)) | (( gfp_t)0x4000u) | (( gfp_t)0x10000u) | (( gfp_t)0x1000u) | (( gfp_t)0x200u) | (( gfp_t)0x400000u)), "GFP_TRANSHUGE"}, {(unsigned long)((( gfp_t)0x10u) | (( gfp_t)0x40u) | (( gfp_t)0x80u) | (( gfp_t)0x20000u) | (( gfp_t)0x02u) | (( gfp_t)0x08u)), "GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE"}, {(unsigned long)((( gfp_t)0x10u) | (( gfp_t)0x40u) | (( gfp_t)0x80u) | (( gfp_t)0x20000u) | (( gfp_t)0x02u)), "GFP_HIGHUSER"}, {(unsigned long)((( gfp_t)0x10u) | (( gfp_t)0x40u) | (( gfp_t)0x80u) | (( gfp_t)0x20000u)), "GFP_USER"}, {(unsigned long)((( gfp_t)0x10u) | (( gfp_t)0x40u) | (( gfp_t)0x80u) | (( gfp_t)0x80000u)), "GFP_TEMPORARY"}, {(unsigned long)((( gfp_t)0x10u) | (( gfp_t)0x40u) | (( gfp_t)0x80u)), "GFP_KERNEL"}, {(unsigned long)((( gfp_t)0x10u) | (( gfp_t)0x40u)), "GFP_NOFS"}, {(unsigned long)((( gfp_t)0x20u)), "GFP_ATOMIC"}, {(unsigned long)((( gfp_t)0x10u)), "GFP_NOIO"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x20u), "GFP_HIGH"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x10u), "GFP_WAIT"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x40u), "GFP_IO"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x100u), "GFP_COLD"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x200u), "GFP_NOWARN"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x400u), "GFP_REPEAT"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x800u), "GFP_NOFAIL"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x1000u), "GFP_NORETRY"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x4000u), "GFP_COMP"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x8000u), "GFP_ZERO"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x10000u), "GFP_NOMEMALLOC"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x2000u), "GFP_MEMALLOC"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x20000u), "GFP_HARDWALL"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x40000u), "GFP_THISNODE"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x80000u), "GFP_RECLAIMABLE"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x100000u), "GFP_KMEMCG"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x08u), "GFP_MOVABLE"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x200000u), "GFP_NOTRACK"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x400000u), "GFP_NO_KSWAPD"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x800000u), "GFP_OTHER_NODE"} ) : "GFP_NOWAIT"
[root@...icio ~]# uname -r
3.10.0-350.el7perf_sync_4_4_v1.x86_64
[root@...icio ~]# perf report | head -15
# To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options.
#
#
# Total Lost Samples: 0
#
# Samples: 128  of event 'kmem:kmalloc'
# Event count (approx.): 128
#
# Overhead  Trace output                                                                                   
# ........  ......................................................................................................................
#
    34.38%  call_site=ffffffff811655cd ptr=0xffff880233c0f000 bytes_req=4096 bytes_alloc=4096 gfp_flags=GFP_KERNEL
    14.84%  call_site=ffffffffa02e25de ptr=0xffff880231f12800 bytes_req=1025 bytes_alloc=2048 gfp_flags=GFP_KERNEL
     4.69%  call_site=ffffffff811ed957 ptr=0xffff880231765700 bytes_req=256 bytes_alloc=256 gfp_flags=GFP_KERNEL|GFP_ZERO
     4.69%  call_site=ffffffff8129461c ptr=0xffff880231563d60 bytes_req=16 bytes_alloc=16 gfp_flags=GFP_KERNEL|GFP_ZERO
[root@...icio ~]#