linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: dt: mailbox: Add TI Message Manager

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 26 Feb 2016 16:30:01 -0600
From:	Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
To:	Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>
Cc:	Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@...com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: dt: mailbox: Add TI Message Manager

Jassi,

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:59 AM, Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com> wrote:
[...]
>> I can make it compatible for today's SoC, but based on what i explained,
>> how about just "rx_<qid>" for the interrupt names?
>> interrupt-names = "rx_005", "rx_057" (I kinda feel using "irq" for
>> interrupt-names is actually redundant information)?
>>
> Feel free to name the interrupts "rx_" instead of "irq_" ... assuming
> the interrupts correspond to only reception of data.
>

Thanks for your reviews. I have now posted a v2: hopefully these meet the needs.

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8442641/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8442671/


-- 
---
Regards,
Nishanth Menon