lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1456469413-931943-25-git-send-email-green@linuxhacker.ru>
Date:	Fri, 26 Feb 2016 01:50:12 -0500
From:	green@...uxhacker.ru
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>,
	Oleg Drokin <green@...uxhacker.ru>
Subject: [PATCH 24/25] staging/lustre: Remove unneeded {} in lprocfs_stats_unlock()

From: Oleg Drokin <green@...uxhacker.ru>

Since there's only one call in those if () else branches, the
braces are not really necessary.

Highlighted by checkpatch.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <green@...uxhacker.ru>
---
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lprocfs_status.h | 10 ++++------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lprocfs_status.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lprocfs_status.h
index 89052b2..4146c9c 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lprocfs_status.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lprocfs_status.h
@@ -426,11 +426,10 @@ static inline void lprocfs_stats_unlock(struct lprocfs_stats *stats, int opc,
 
 	case LPROCFS_GET_SMP_ID:
 		if (stats->ls_flags & LPROCFS_STATS_FLAG_NOPERCPU) {
-			if (stats->ls_flags & LPROCFS_STATS_FLAG_IRQ_SAFE) {
+			if (stats->ls_flags & LPROCFS_STATS_FLAG_IRQ_SAFE)
 				spin_unlock_irqrestore(&stats->ls_lock, *flags);
-			} else {
+			else
 				spin_unlock(&stats->ls_lock);
-			}
 		} else {
 			put_cpu();
 		}
@@ -438,11 +437,10 @@ static inline void lprocfs_stats_unlock(struct lprocfs_stats *stats, int opc,
 
 	case LPROCFS_GET_NUM_CPU:
 		if (stats->ls_flags & LPROCFS_STATS_FLAG_NOPERCPU) {
-			if (stats->ls_flags & LPROCFS_STATS_FLAG_IRQ_SAFE) {
+			if (stats->ls_flags & LPROCFS_STATS_FLAG_IRQ_SAFE)
 				spin_unlock_irqrestore(&stats->ls_lock, *flags);
-			} else {
+			else
 				spin_unlock(&stats->ls_lock);
-			}
 		}
 		return;
 	}
-- 
2.1.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ