linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] device property: fix for couple of bugs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160226080252.GC29434@kuha.fi.intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 26 Feb 2016 10:02:52 +0200
From:	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	John Youn <John.Youn@...opsys.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] device property: fix for couple of bugs

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:37:43AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, February 22, 2016 04:50:39 PM Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > The fwnode->secondary is causing problems when a property_set is
> > providing the primary fwnode.
> > 
> > Both of these fixes are a bit clumsy looking IMO, but I didn't have
> > better ideas. I think the second one fixing the use-after-free bug
> > should ideally be taken care of in set_secondary_fwnode() instead of
> > device_remove_property_set(), but I didn't have any ideas how to do
> > that.
> 
> Can you please CC device property framework patches to linux-acpi?
> 
> They are somewhat easier to handle this way.

Will do.

Thanks,

-- 
heikki