[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56D00390.7030600@xilinx.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 08:49:36 +0100
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@...tec.com>
CC: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Linux-MIPS <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@...inx.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Ravikiran Gummaluri <rgummal@...inx.com>,
"Ley Foon Tan" <lftan@...era.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@...esas.com>,
"Scott Branden" <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...sol.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Duc Dang <dhdang@....com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Gabriele Paoloni <gabriele.paoloni@...wei.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>, Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] PCI: xilinx: Allow build on MIPS platforms
On 25.2.2016 16:43, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 05:53:25PM +0000, Paul Burton wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 11:46:28AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Paul Burton <paul.burton@...tec.com> wrote:
>>>> Allow the xilinx-pcie driver to be built on MIPS platforms. This will be
>>>> used on the MIPS Boston board.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@...tec.com>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v3:
>>>> - Split out from Boston patchset.
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v2: None
>>>>
>>>> drivers/pci/host/Kconfig | 2 +-
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig
>>>> index 75a6054..0aee193 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ config PCI_KEYSTONE
>>>>
>>>> config PCIE_XILINX
>>>> bool "Xilinx AXI PCIe host bridge support"
>>>> - depends on ARCH_ZYNQ
>>>> + depends on ARCH_ZYNQ || MIPS
>>>
>>> Why don't you just remove the dependency? Then it gets better build coverage.
>>>
>>> Rob
>>
>> That seems like a call best made by whomever has to maintain this - if
>> that's the preferred way to go I'm fine with it.
>
> I'm in favor of removing the dependency if possible. I guess Michal
> would be the person to ack that.
Not a problem to remove dependency on archs. There is pending support
for Microblaze anyway.
Thanks,
Michal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists