[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56D04E98.8040209@xs4all.nl>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 14:09:44 +0100
From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
To: Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...sol.com>,
Tiffany Lin <tiffany.lin@...iatek.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
daniel.thompson@...aro.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
Pawel Osciak <posciak@...omium.org>
Cc: Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>,
Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, PoChun.Lin@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] Add MT8173 Video Encoder Driver and VPU Driver
On 02/26/2016 12:58 PM, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> <snip>
>
>> Nice!
>>
>> Can you try 'v4l2-compliance -s'? Note that this may not work since I know
>> that v4l2-compliance doesn't work all that well with codecs, but I am
>> curious what the output is when you try streaming.
>
> Sorry for the off topic question.
>
> Does every new v4l2 encoder/decoder driver must use v4l2 mem2mem device
> framework, with other words is that mandatory?
>
No, that's not mandatory. In most cases it will simplify your code, but
sometimes it only makes it harder and then you are better off doing it
yourself.
Regards,
Hans
Powered by blists - more mailing lists