[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMXgnP4Wss0ctx7mHzD0WHL4+-fC59iLZNkYONE5pAeHYr18+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 14:18:23 +0100
From: Alban Crequy <alban.crequy@...il.com>
To: LXC development mailing-list <lxc-devel@...ts.linuxcontainers.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Aditya Kali <adityakali@...gle.com>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [lxc-devel] CGroup Namespaces (v10)
Hi,
On 29 January 2016 at 09:54, <serge.hallyn@...ntu.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> following is a revised set of the CGroup Namespace patchset which Aditya
> Kali has previously sent. The code can also be found in the cgroupns.v10
> branch of
>
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/sergeh/linux-security.git/
>
> To summarize the semantics:
>
> 1. CLONE_NEWCGROUP re-uses 0x02000000, which was previously CLONE_STOPPED
What's the best way for a userspace application to test at run-time
whether the kernel supports cgroup namespaces? Would you recommend to
test if the file /proc/self/ns/cgroup exists?
Thanks!
Alban
Powered by blists - more mailing lists