lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56D06E3F.1020100@openwrt.org>
Date:	Fri, 26 Feb 2016 16:24:47 +0100
From:	John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org>
To:	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:	"Fred Chang (?????????)" <Fred.Chang@...iatek.com>,
	"Steven Liu (?????????)" <steven.liu@...iatek.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"Carlos Huang (?????????)" <Carlos.Huang@...iatek.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 03/12] net-next: mediatek: add embedded switch driver
 (ESW)



On 26/02/2016 16:18, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 03:21:35PM +0100, John Crispin wrote:
>> The ESW is found in many of the old 100mbit MIPS based SoCs. it has 5
>> external ports, 1 cpu port and 1 further port that the internal HW
>> offloading engine connects to.
>>
>> This driver is very basic and only provides basic init and irq support.
>> The SoC and switch core both have support for a special tag making DSA
>> support possible.
> 
> Hi Crispin
> 
> There was recently a discussion about adding switches without using
> DSA or switchdev. It was pretty much decided we would not accept such
> drivers.
> 
> Sorry
> 
> 	Andrew
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-mediatek mailing list
> Linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
> 

Hi,

would the series be ok if we just dropped those parts and then have a
driver in the kernel that wont do much with the out of tree patches ?

the problem here is that on one side people complain about vendors not
sending code upstream. once they start being a good citizen and provide
funding to send stuff upstream the feedback tends to be very bad as seen
here. we are planning on doing a DSA driver but one step at a time. this
kind of feedback will inevitably lead to vendors doing second thoughts
of upstream contributions.

	John

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ