lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwp-qCtV1dRggHotRDTNAmRZWVjm-khkB1q1z8+_0xQKg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 26 Feb 2016 09:12:46 -0800
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Cc:	Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, lwn@....net,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request from pty_write [was:
 Linux 4.4.2]

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 12:56 AM, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz> wrote:
>
> Sure, both vmlinux w/ its separated .debuginfo sections vmlinux.debug
> are at:
> http://labs.suse.cz/jslaby/bug-968218/

I'm not seeing anything odd there.

It does feel like CPU state corruption - either due to a qemu bug, or
due to some odd trap/interrupt handling bug of ours.

Or possibly a CPU/microcode bug. You wouldn't happen to run this on an
AMD Piledriver-based CPU with the 0x06000832 microcode?

Because we do have a pending qemu-related bug-report that turned out
to be a AMD microcode problem with NMI delivery. Looking at that bug
report, it actually looks rather similar - also due to a confused RIP.

                   Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ