[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56D099DE.7070706@fb.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 10:30:54 -0800
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
To: Matias Bjorling <m@...rling.me>, <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] LightNVM patches for 4.5-rc
On 02/26/2016 10:21 AM, Matias Bjorling wrote:
> On 02/20/2016 08:52 AM, Matias Bjørling wrote:
>> Hi Jens,
>>
>> Sorry, I was living in a fairy tail land, where patches are
>> miraculously applied without being sent upstream. Leading me to test
>> on top of the wrong base.
>>
>> I was missing three patches, which I should have sent for previous -rc
>> round.
>>
>> The first patch fixes taking a normal spinlock in interrupt context.
>> Second and third are cleanups, and at last the patch that previously
>> did not compile.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Matias
>>
>> Javier González (2):
>> lightnvm: update closed list outside of intr context
>> lightnvm: generalize rrpc ppa calculations
>>
>> Matias Bjørling (2):
>> lightnvm: rename ->nr_pages to ->nr_sects
>> lightnvm: remove struct nvm_dev->total_blocks
>>
>> drivers/lightnvm/core.c | 6 +--
>> drivers/lightnvm/gennvm.c | 7 ++--
>> drivers/lightnvm/rrpc.c | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>> drivers/lightnvm/rrpc.h | 15 ++++++--
>> include/linux/lightnvm.h | 2 +-
>> 5 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
>>
>
> Hi Jens,
>
> Please consider to apply these for the next -rc. If only part of them,
> then just the first path, as it fixes a problem when blocks are closed
> during a write.
Applied 1-4, thanks.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists