linux-kernel - Re: [RFC V2 PATCH] kernfs: create raw version kernfs_path_len and kernfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOS58YNAgyCcepowr=gFrL+dZZ04ua-zLUtsOY6qGh=+_J52_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 27 Feb 2016 06:51:01 -0500
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Yang Shi <yang.shi@...aro.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
	Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC V2 PATCH] kernfs: create raw version kernfs_path_len and kernfs_path

Hello,

On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 6:45 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>> It can be, but we can print out the ino and userland can match that up
>> with path if necessary.
>
> Wouldn't be cgroup id the better choice?

AFAIK we aren't exposing cgroup id to userland anywhere right now.
Eventually, I think the right thing to do is using the same number for
both.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun