lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAO6TR8VP-v3b3Vz_-X9Ht9DyzMuNTG7HOdm3waL3Z6pP_R1Yiw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 27 Feb 2016 16:53:00 -0700
From:	Jeff Merkey <linux.mdb@...il.com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: checkpatch.pl false positives on asm single line statements

Hi Joe,

Ran across a false positive case on asm volatile single line
statements.  If you
use asm volatile it assumes its a complex statement fires off an error:

# ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict test.patch

ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
#9: FILE: arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h:42:
+#define BREAKL() asm volatile("int3")

ERROR: Missing Signed-off-by: line(s)

total: 2 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 8 lines checked

temp.patch has style problems, please review.

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.

Jeff

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ