[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAO6TR8VP-v3b3Vz_-X9Ht9DyzMuNTG7HOdm3waL3Z6pP_R1Yiw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 16:53:00 -0700
From: Jeff Merkey <linux.mdb@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: checkpatch.pl false positives on asm single line statements
Hi Joe,
Ran across a false positive case on asm volatile single line
statements. If you
use asm volatile it assumes its a complex statement fires off an error:
# ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict test.patch
ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
#9: FILE: arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h:42:
+#define BREAKL() asm volatile("int3")
ERROR: Missing Signed-off-by: line(s)
total: 2 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 8 lines checked
temp.patch has style problems, please review.
NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
Jeff
Powered by blists - more mailing lists