linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2][GIT PULL] Timekeeping updates to tip/timers/core for 4.6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1602270849350.3638@nanos>
Date:	Sat, 27 Feb 2016 08:50:58 +0100 (CET)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Christopher Hall <christopher.s.hall@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2][GIT PULL] Timekeeping updates to tip/timers/core
 for 4.6

John,

On Fri, 26 Feb 2016, John Stultz wrote:

> Hey Thomas, Ingo,
>   Here's my somewhat truncated queue for 4.6. I was hoping to
> get the cross-timestamp patchset from Christopher sent along,
> but he's got some last minute changes to address feedback from
> Andy, so I'm holding off.
> 
> If the response is good for that last change, I may try to send
> another set with those changes next week, but we're cutting it
> fairly close to -rc6, so I'll check with you before doing so.

If it's just the small fixup to address review comments, we still should take
it.
 
> So.. two tiny cleanup fixes is all for now.
> 
> Boring is good, right?

:)

Thanks,

	tglx