[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160227083857.GY1770@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 10:38:57 +0200
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: "dbasehore ." <dbasehore@...omium.org>
Cc: Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] scsi: allow scsi devices to use direct complete
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 12:10:03AM -0800, dbasehore . wrote:
> A device is not able to use direct complete if its children do not
> also use direct complete. Even though the SCSI layer leaves devices
> runtime suspended, the way it does it still prevents its parent from
> using direct complete.
Okay.
Do you need to provide ->complete() hook that then resumes the device
when system is resumed (since the device resume hook is never called
when direct_complete is set)? Along the lines of
pm_complete_with_resume_check().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists