[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5DrTY3ho0Z_jXxeYMqbd6GmUKRwD1LB61vM1ZTGQAYOrg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 10:56:49 -0300
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Akshay Bhat <akshay.bhat@...esys.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Justin Waters <justin.waters@...esys.com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>, Stefan Roese <sr@...x.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] watchdog: imx2_wdt: add external reset support via
'ext-reset-output' dt prop
Rob,
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Akshay Bhat <akshay.bhat@...esys.com> wrote:
>> I have no objections against the idea and the code itself.
>> But as Guenter pointed out: it would be handy to get feedback from the
>> devicetree maintainers on the above discussion.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Wim.
>>
>
> Any suggestions on whether a vendor specific prefix is necessary?
Any comments?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists