[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160228170109.GA16322@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 18:01:09 +0100
From: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Softirq priority inversion from "softirq: reduce latencies"
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com> :
[...]
> Hrm, relatively new + tasklet woes rings a bell. Ah, that..
>
> <quote>
> What's worse is that at the point where this code was written it was
> already well known that tasklets are a steaming pile of crap and
> should die.
> </quote>
>
> Source thereof https://lwn.net/Articles/588457/
tasklets are ingrained in the dmaengine API (see Documentation/dmaengine/client.txt
and drivers/dma/virt-dma.h::vchan_cookie_complete).
Moving everything to irq context or handling his own sub-{jiffy/ms} timer
while losing async dma doesn't exactly smell like roses either. :o(
--
Ueimor
Powered by blists - more mailing lists