[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+5yK5GF4mCZe8xeDwnj7QOz1m2xz2HOVkO59wdsBktZ3kmzYA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 12:35:56 +0530
From: Amitoj Kaur Chawla <amitoj1606@...il.com>
To: Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
klassert@...hematik.tu-chemnitz.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] 3c59x: Use setup_timer()
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 12:18 AM, Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, David Miller wrote:
>
>> From: Amitoj Kaur Chawla <amitoj1606@...il.com>
>> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 19:28:19 +0530
>>
>>> Convert a call to init_timer and accompanying intializations of
>>> the timer's data and function fields to a call to setup_timer.
>>>
>>> The Coccinelle semantic patch that fixes this problem is
>>> as follows:
>>>
>>> // <smpl>
>>> @@
>>> expression t,f,d;
>>> @@
>>>
>>> -init_timer(&t);
>>> +setup_timer(&t,f,d);
>>> ...
>>> -t.data = d;
>>> -t.function = f;
>>> // </smpl>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Amitoj Kaur Chawla <amitoj1606@...il.com>
>>
>>
>> Applied.
>
>
> Hi David, Amitoj,
>
> The patch here seemed to remove the call to add_timer(&vp->timer) which
> applies the expires time. Would that be an issue?
>
> -Stafford
I'm sorry. This is my mistake. How can I rectify it now that the patch
is applied?
Should I send a patch adding it back?
Amitoj
Powered by blists - more mailing lists