[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAmzW4N0YJc_O9ArC8e7Q5y4rmbHjj6-Q1yfvZ5LvORvG764cg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 16:40:02 +0900
From: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] mm/page_ref, crypto/async_pq: don't put_page from __exit
2016-02-29 6:57 GMT+09:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>:
> The addition of tracepoints to the page reference tracking had an
> unfortunate side-effect in at least one driver that calls put_page
> from its exit function, resulting in a link error:
>
> `.exit.text' referenced in section `__jump_table' of crypto/built-in.o: defined in discarded section `.exit.text' of crypto/built-in.o
>
> I could not come up with a nice solution that ignores __jump_table
> entries in discarded code, so we probably now have to treat this
> as something a driver is not allowed to do. Removing the __exit
> annotation avoids the problem in this particular driver, but the
> same problem could come back any time in other code.
>
> On a related problem regarding the runtime patching for SMP
> operations on ARM uniprocessor systems, we resorted to not
> drop the .exit section at link time, but that doesn't seem
> appropriate here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Fixes: 0f80830dd044 ("mm/page_ref: add tracepoint to track down page reference manipulation")
> ---
> crypto/async_tx/async_pq.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/crypto/async_tx/async_pq.c b/crypto/async_tx/async_pq.c
> index c0748bbd4c08..be167145aa55 100644
> --- a/crypto/async_tx/async_pq.c
> +++ b/crypto/async_tx/async_pq.c
> @@ -442,7 +442,7 @@ static int __init async_pq_init(void)
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> -static void __exit async_pq_exit(void)
> +static void async_pq_exit(void)
> {
> put_page(pq_scribble_page);
> }
Hello, Arnd.
I think that we can avoid this error by using __free_page().
It would not be inlined so calling it would have no problem.
Could you test it, please?
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists