[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56D40691.6030002@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 10:51:29 +0200
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<plagnioj@...osoft.com>, <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] video/fbdev: avoid module usage in non-modular sparc
code,Re: [PATCH 0/3] video/fbdev: avoid module usage in non-modular sparc
code
On 26/02/16 19:21, David Miller wrote:
> From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 12:58:00 +0200
>
>> While doing this, did you just go forward removing the module support,
>> or did you check if it would be trivial to make the driver build as a
>> module? I wouldn't be surprised if in some cases all that would need to
>> be done is change the Kconfig's bool to tristate.
>
> I think what he is doing is reasonable, and none of these sparc drivers
> have any reason to be built modular. You need them to have any bootup
> console whatsoever, so they have to be built in statically to be
> usable at all.
I disagree. Having drivers buildable as modules is always good, even if
the normal use case would be to have them as built-in.
> I plan to apply this patch series to my sparc tree as-is.
They are fbdev patches without any dependency to sparc afaics. So let's
apply them via fbdev tree.
Tomi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists