[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <8DAA6B46-4AF3-4DB2-AFAF-E9749FA178E8@sperl.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 11:09:03 +0100
From: Martin Sperl <martin@...rl.org>
To: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
Cc: linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] bcm2835 SDHOST controller
> On 27.02.2016, at 00:05, Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net> wrote:
>
> Here's a series to enable the SDHOST controller. It gives us better
> performance than our old sdhci-bcm2835.c. The downstream Raspberry Pi
> kernel appears to be using this controller by default at this point.
>
> I've tried to do some testing on it (mounting filesystem,
> reading/writing files, speed tests), but I'm not sure what a good
> testing regimen for storage drivers would be.
>
> Eric Anholt (4):
> dt-bindings: Add binding for brcm,bcm2835-sdhost.
> mmc: bcm2835-sdhost: Add new driver for the internal SD controller.
> ARM: bcm2835: Include SDHOST in the device tree.
> ARM: bcm2835: Enable SDHOST by default.
This patchset misses defconfig changes to enable
the new sdhost driver.
So we end up with a default kernel
without the sdhost driver compiled in
but with sdhost enabled in the default device-tree (patch4)
resulting in a system that does not boot.
Thanks,
Martin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists