[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1456740770.4666.366.camel@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 10:12:50 +0000
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>, hpa@...or.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, luto@...capital.net,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
david.vrabel@...rix.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com, mcb30@...e.org,
jgross@...e.com, ming.lei@...onical.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, arnd@...db.de,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, jbaron@...mai.com, ananth@...ibm.com,
anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com, davem@...emloft.net,
masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/7] firmware: port built-in section to linker table
On Fri, 2016-02-19 at 05:45 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> This ports built-in firmware to use linker tables,
> this replaces the custom section solution with a
> generic solution.
>
> This also demos the use of the .rodata (SECTION_RO)
> linker tables.
>
> Tested with 0 built-in firmware, 1 and 2 built-in
> firmwares successfully.
I think we'd do better to rip this support out entirely. It just isn't
needed; firmware can live in an initramfs and don't even need *any*
actual running userspace support to load it from there these days, do
we?
--
dwmw2
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (5691 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists