[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1456741007.13244.159.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 12:16:47 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mfd: intel_quark_i2c_gpio: remove clock tree on
error path
On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 16:58 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 02/19, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > There is a potential resource leak in case when ->probe() fails. We
> > have to
> > unregister and remove clock tree which is done here.
> >
> > This is a follow up to previously pushed commit c4726abce63b ("mfd:
> > intel_quark_i2c_gpio: Use clkdev_create()") that prevents double
> > free() when
> > clkdev_drop() followed by kfree() in devm_kcalloc() release stage.
> >
> > I leave Fixes tag here, but the backporting will require to
> > backport the commit
> > c4726abce63b ("mfd: intel_quark_i2c_gpio: Use clkdev_create()")
> > first.
> >
> > Fixes: 60ae5b9f5cdd (mfd: intel_quark_i2c_gpio: Add Intel Quark
> > X1000 I2C-GPIO MFD Driver)
> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
>
> Both look fine to me.
Thanks for review!
> You may also want to use
> devm_clk_register() instead so that cleanup is easier.
Perhaps in the future.
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists