linux-kernel - Applied "regulator: act8865: Remove "static" from local variable" to the regulator tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 29 Feb 2016 23:02:58 +0900
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Maarten ter Huurne <maarten@...ewalker.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Applied "regulator: act8865: Remove "static" from local variable" to the regulator tree

The patch

   regulator: act8865: Remove "static" from local variable

has been applied to the regulator tree at

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From abea1bb08c1016d06bf21d1e5a56f10b31f0c60f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maarten ter Huurne <maarten@...ewalker.org>
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 16:53:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: act8865: Remove "static" from local variable

There is no need to preserve its value between calls. I guess this
was a copy-paste slip-up.

Signed-off-by: Maarten ter Huurne <maarten@...ewalker.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c
index f8d4cd3d1397..984c30fa9516 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c
@@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ static void act8865_power_off(void)
 static int act8865_pmic_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
 			      const struct i2c_device_id *i2c_id)
 {
-	static const struct regulator_desc *regulators;
+	const struct regulator_desc *regulators;
 	struct act8865_platform_data pdata_of, *pdata;
 	struct device *dev = &client->dev;
 	struct device_node **of_node;
-- 
2.7.0