[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160229153934.GB14848@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 15:39:35 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Jan Glauber <jglauber@...ium.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, marc.zyngier@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] arm64/perf: Enable PMCR long cycle counter bit
Hi Jan,
I've queued this lot on my perf/updates branch, but I just noticed an
oddity whilst dealing with some potential conflicts with the kvm tree.
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 05:50:13PM +0100, Jan Glauber wrote:
> With the long cycle counter bit (LC) disabled the cycle counter is not
> working on ThunderX SOC (ThunderX only implements Aarch64).
> Also, according to documentation LC == 0 is deprecated.
>
> To keep the code simple the patch does not introduce 64 bit wide counter
> functions. Instead writing the cycle counter always sets the upper
> 32 bits so overflow interrupts are generated as before.
>
> Original patch from Andrew Pinksi <Andrew.Pinksi@...iumnetworks.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Glauber <jglauber@...ium.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> index 0ed05f6..c68fa98 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> @@ -405,6 +405,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group *armv8_pmuv3_attr_groups[] = {
> #define ARMV8_PMCR_D (1 << 3) /* CCNT counts every 64th cpu cycle */
> #define ARMV8_PMCR_X (1 << 4) /* Export to ETM */
> #define ARMV8_PMCR_DP (1 << 5) /* Disable CCNT if non-invasive debug*/
> +#define ARMV8_PMCR_LC (1 << 6) /* Overflow on 64 bit cycle counter */
> #define ARMV8_PMCR_N_SHIFT 11 /* Number of counters supported */
> #define ARMV8_PMCR_N_MASK 0x1f
> #define ARMV8_PMCR_MASK 0x3f /* Mask for writable bits */
You haven't extended this mask to cover the LC bit, so it will be ignored
by armv8pmu_pmcr_write afaict.
How did you test this? I can easily update the mask, but it would be
good to know that it doesn't end up cause a breakage.
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists