[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160229153901.GA27327@yury-N73SV>
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:39:01 +0300
From: Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <pinskia@...il.com>,
<Prasun.Kapoor@...iumnetworks.com>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
<broonie@...nel.org>, <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <agraf@...e.de>,
<Nathan_Lynch@...tor.com>, <klimov.linux@...il.com>,
"Zhangjian (Bamvor)" <bamvor.zhangjian@...wei.com>,
<schwab@...e.de>, <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
<jan.dakinevich@...il.com>, <joseph@...esourcery.com>,
<christoph.muellner@...obroma-systems.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC5 PATCH v6 00/21] ILP32 for ARM64
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 09:23:35AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> I have no idea whether this is good news or bad news ;-)
This is neutral news, I think. V5 had ~25 fails, and aarch32 and lp64 has
~5 fails each. I believe I'll manage to achieve ~25 fails soon. The
rest fails are not clear for me now, so I'll investigate it...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists