[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANLsYkw7jVkE3KcuOz0w4ETGhRpGs_wzu6c+_MY+i0uzaXFhag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 09:10:06 -0700
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/hwtracing: make coresight-etm-perf.c explicitly non-modular
On 27 February 2016 at 13:21, Paul Gortmaker
<paul.gortmaker@...driver.com> wrote:
> In commit 941943cf519f7cacbbcecee5c4ef4b77b466bd5c ("drivers/hwtracing:
> make coresight-* explicitly non-modular") we removed all uses of
> modular functions/macros in favour of their built-in equivlents in
> this subsystem.
>
> However that commit and commit 0bcbf2e30ff2271b54f54c8697a185f7d86ec6e4
> ("coresight: etm-perf: new PMU driver for ETM tracers") were in flight
> at the same time, and hence one new non-modular user of module_init
> crept back in. Fix it up like we did all the others.
>
> Since module_init translates to device_initcall in the non-modular
> case, the init ordering remains unchanged with this commit.
>
> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
> ---
> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c
> index 36153a77e982..755125f7917f 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c
> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
> #include <linux/device.h>
> #include <linux/list.h>
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> -#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/perf_event.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/types.h>
> @@ -390,4 +390,4 @@ static int __init etm_perf_init(void)
>
> return ret;
> }
> -module_init(etm_perf_init);
> +device_initcall(etm_perf_init);
Yes of course - Applied.
Greg, given the triviality of the changes, can you still pick this up
for the next merge window?
Thanks,
Mathieu
> --
> 2.6.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists