lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 29 Feb 2016 17:28:35 +0100
From:	Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Costless huge virtual memory? /dev/same, /dev/null?

Hello,

I'm wondering whether we could introduce a /dev/same device to allow
costless huge virtual memory.

The use case is the simulation of the execution of a big irregular HPC
application, to provision memory usage, cpu time, etc. We know how much
time each computation loop takes, and it's easy to replace them with a
mere accounting. We'd however like to avoid having to revamp the rest
of the code, which does allocation/memcpys/etc., by just replacing
the allocation calls with virtual allocations, i.e. allocations which
return addresses of buffers that one can read/write, but the values you
read are not necessarily what you wrote, i.e. the data is not actually
properly stored (since we don't do the actual computations that's not a
problem).

The way we currently do this is by some folding: we map the same normal
file several times contiguously to form the virtual allocation. By using
a small 1MiB file, this limits memory consumption to 1MiB plus the page
table (and fits the dumb data in a typical cache). This however creates
one VMA per file mapping, we get limited by the 65535 VMA limit, and
VMA lookup becomes slow.

The way I could see is to have a /dev/same device: when you open it, it
allocates one page. When you mmap it, it maps the same page over the
whole resulting single VMA.

This is a quite specific use case, but it seems to be easy to implement,
and it seems to me that it could be integrated mainline. Actually I was
thinking that /dev/null itself could be providing that service?
(currently it returns ENODEV)

What do people think?  Is there perhaps another solution to achieve this
that I didn't think about?

Samuel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ